The Big List of AI Visibility Tools (AEO & GEO Tracking)

This resource will save you the tokens and time to find AI visibility tools from established software companies and funded specialists. The table shows who each tool is best for, entry price, demo requirement and the top three pros and cons. Each tool name links to its full details in The Big List of AI Visibility Trackers below. Prices were checked on October 10, 2026.

Last updated October 12, 2026.

Compare All 54 AI Visibility Tools by Audience, Price, and Demo Requirement

Prices are public list prices before tax, in the currency each vendor displays (USD, EUR or GBP), with no conversion. Quote means no fixed public price was found. It does not mean free. Column details are explained below the Big List.

The Big List of AI Visibility Trackers

This is the full detail for all 54 tools: best fit, entry price and tiers, demo requirement, entry allowance, AI platforms, measurement method, top three pros and cons, and links to the vendor. The list is grouped by product type.

Dedicated AI visibility trackers (21)

These products were built to track how AI engines mention, cite and recommend a brand.

AccuLLM (AccuRanker)

AccuLLM (AccuRanker) is best for agencies and brands wanting a structured daily tracker from a rank-tracking vendor. Plans start at $206 a month. You can buy without a demo.

• Best for: Agencies and brands wanting a structured daily tracker from a rank-tracking vendor
• Entry price: $206/mo
• Plans and tiers: Lite $206/mo; Pro $521/mo; enterprise quote.
• Demo requirement: No for Lite/Pro; enterprise sales-led
• Entry allowance: Lite: 100 prompts, 1 brand; unlimited users and retained history
• AI platforms: ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews, AI Mode
• How it measures: Daily prompt and citation tracking
• Why it is listed: Established parent. AccuRanker product with public commercial plans.

Top 3 pros

• Established AccuRanker parent
• Four engines and unlimited users
• Historical retention and daily reporting

Top 3 cons

• Higher $206 entry price
• Lite permits only one brand
• API is Pro; Gemini/Claude absent from documented four-engine set

Buying note. Prices come from the AccuLLM tab of AccuRanker's pricing page. The SEO tab lists different products.

Pricing | Website | Back to the comparison table

AthenaHQ

AthenaHQ is best for growth teams wanting an action-oriented GEO platform. Plans start at $295 a month. You can buy without a demo.

• Best for: Growth teams wanting an action-oriented GEO platform
• Entry price: $295/mo
• Plans and tiers: Starter $295/mo; enterprise quote. The free $25 credit is a one-time test allowance.
• Demo requirement: No for Starter; enterprise sales-led
• Entry allowance: Starter: 3,600 credits; one credit per AI response; unlimited seats
• AI platforms: Advertises 11+ supported AI models; verify selected engines and credit allocation
• How it measures: Response-based monitoring and prioritized action center
• Why it is listed: Funded company specialist. Y Combinator company profile identifies founders and team.

Top 3 pros

• YC-backed named founders and team
• Monitoring connected to optimization actions
• Unlimited seats on Starter

Top 3 cons

• $295 entry cost
• Credits are used per response, so more engines raise the cost
• API and advanced enterprise controls may add cost

Buying note. Each AI response uses one credit, so 3,600 responses covers far fewer than 3,600 prompts checked daily on every engine.

Pricing | Website | Company source | Back to the comparison table

Authoritas AI Search

Authoritas AI Search is best for agencies/research teams wanting flexible engine selection and transparent credit pricing. Plans start at £89 a month. You can buy without a demo.

• Best for: Agencies/research teams wanting flexible engine selection and transparent credit pricing
• Entry price: £89/mo
• Plans and tiers: Free 50 credits; P1 £89; P2 £229; P3 £379/mo; larger plans from £1,129.
• Demo requirement: No for public plans
• Entry allowance: P1: 2,000 credits; queries cost roughly 1-5 credits depending on engine
• AI platforms: Selectable AI engines/models; search-grounded variants have higher plan gates
• How it measures: Supports API and consumer-interface variants; choose explicitly
• Why it is listed: Established provider. Long-running Authoritas search analytics provider.

Top 3 pros

• Established Authoritas company
• Transparent credit tiers and engine selection
• Free allowance to test before purchasing

Top 3 cons

• Credit cost varies by engine
• Search-grounded model access requires higher tiers
• API answers and browser answers are not interchangeable

Buying note. Separate model variants can measure different behavior even when their brand names match.

Pricing | Website | Back to the comparison table

Bluefish

Bluefish is best for large brands combining AI monitoring with brand/performance marketing. Pricing is by quote, with no fixed public price. Purchase goes through sales.

• Best for: Large brands combining AI monitoring with brand/performance marketing
• Entry price: Quote
• Plans and tiers: No public fixed price verified.
• Demo requirement: Demo offered; no public paid checkout found
• Entry allowance: Contract-specific
• AI platforms: Cross-model monitoring; exact purchased scope not public
• How it measures: Enterprise AI brand monitoring plus marketing/advertising workflows
• Why it is listed: Company specialist. Commercial enterprise company with documented experienced founding team.

Top 3 pros

• Designed for large-brand monitoring
• Brand and performance marketing in one platform
• Enterprise team/customer positioning

Top 3 cons

• No public pricing
• Public quotas and engine entitlements are sparse
• Implementation and broader marketing scope suit larger teams

Buying note. Confirm consumer-interface versus API sampling, quotas and data exports in a sales review.

Website | Back to the comparison table

Brandlight

Brandlight is best for enterprise brand/communications teams monitoring narratives and reputation. Pricing is by quote, with no fixed public price. Purchase goes through sales.

• Best for: Enterprise brand/communications teams monitoring narratives and reputation
• Entry price: Quote
• Plans and tiers: No public fixed price verified.
• Demo requirement: Demo offered; mandatory-demo requirement not stated
• Entry allowance: Contract-specific
• AI platforms: Multiple AI surfaces; exact engines/limits contract-specific
• How it measures: Brand visibility, sentiment/narratives, optimization and AI advertising intelligence
• Why it is listed: Funded company specialist. Official company announcement identifies CEO and Series A investors.

Top 3 pros

• Brand narrative and sentiment focus
• Connects visibility to content and advertising
• Named leadership and disclosed institutional funding

Top 3 cons

• No public price
• Usage/engine limits require a quote
• Broader enterprise workflow may be excessive for basic tracking

Website | Company source | Back to the comparison table

ChatRank

ChatRank is best for in-house marketing teams wanting AI tracking with weekly optimization recommendations. Plans start at $499 a month. You can buy without a demo.

• Best for: In-house marketing teams wanting AI tracking with weekly optimization recommendations
• Entry price: $499/mo
• Plans and tiers: Plus $499; Pro $999; Power $1,999/mo. Annual billing lowers these to $416, $833 and $1,666 a month, billed upfront at $4,990, $9,990 and $19,990.
• Demo requirement: No; self-serve sign-up. A free 30-minute discovery call is also offered
• Entry allowance: Plus: 20 topics, weekly data updates, up to 5 recommendations a week, unlimited users
• AI platforms: Plus: ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews. Pro and Power add Perplexity and other models
• How it measures: Topic-grouped prompt tracking with weekly updates on Plus and Pro and daily updates on Power
• Why it is listed: Company specialist. ChatRank, Inc., founded December 2024 by Jon Mest (CEO) and Joe Delgado (CTO), with named customers including Visa and Arkose Labs.

Top 3 pros

• Unlimited users on every plan
• Weekly optimization recommendations included
• Named founders and brand customers

Top 3 cons

• Plus covers 20 topics on two surfaces for $499
• API access is listed as Enterprise only
• Company is under two years old with no disclosed funding

Buying note. The Power card mentions API access while the plan table lists API as Enterprise only, so confirm before buying. Customer names are vendor claims. chatrank.ai is the product listed here, and chatrank.us is a separate product from a different company. Prices read from the vendor's pricing page on October 12, 2026.

Pricing | Website | Company source | Back to the comparison table

Evertune

Evertune is best for large consumer brands needing repeated perception/product research. Plans start at $800 a month. Purchase goes through sales.

• Best for: Large consumer brands needing repeated perception/product research
• Entry price: $800/mo
• Plans and tiers: Pro starts $800/mo; enterprise quote.
• Demo requirement: Demo CTA on Pro; no public paid checkout found
• Entry allowance: Vendor advertises 100,000 prompts across 11 models on Pro
• AI platforms: 11 models; global research and configurable cadence
• How it measures: Large repeated prompt panel and brand/product perception research
• Why it is listed: Company specialist. Named cofounders from The Trade Desk and documented operating team.

Top 3 pros

• Broad repeated-sampling research
• Product/category and global brand analysis
• Experienced named founders and operating team

Top 3 cons

• $800 entry is high for small teams
• Public purchase route goes through sales
• Confirm what the unusually large prompt allowance counts

Buying note. The vendor's prompt count uses its own terminology and does not match other vendors' unique tracked prompts.

Pricing | Website | Company source | Back to the comparison table

Goodie

Goodie is best for teams wanting tracking, content actions and revenue attribution together. Plans start at $399 a month (billed annually). Lower tiers sell without a demo, and larger tiers go through sales.

• Best for: Teams wanting tracking, content actions and revenue attribution together
• Entry price: $399/mo (billed annually)
• Plans and tiers: Core $399/mo billed annually; Pro $999/mo billed annually; enterprise quote. Monthly rate not confirmed.
• Demo requirement: Core trial self-service; Pro/Enterprise demo CTA
• Entry allowance: Core: 120 prompts, 5 seats, 50 optimizations
• AI platforms: Core: ChatGPT, AI Overviews, Perplexity, AI Mode, Copilot; broader models on upgrades
• How it measures: Visibility, brand accuracy, content workflows and attribution
• Why it is listed: Company specialist. Documented agency/search background and operating team.

Top 3 pros

• Monitoring through optimization in one platform
• Attribution and brand-fact workflows
• Strategist support on documented Core plan

Top 3 cons

• Quoted entry requires annual billing
• Pro jumps to $999 annual equivalent
• Broader model coverage and team capacity cost more

Buying note. The live pricing page showed the annual toggle. Treat $399 as an annual-billing price until month-to-month pricing is confirmed.

Pricing | Website | Company source | Back to the comparison table

Gumshoe

Gumshoe is best for teams studying buyer personas and simulated purchase conversations. Plans start at $99 a month (per project). You can buy without a demo.

• Best for: Teams studying buyer personas and simulated purchase conversations
• Entry price: $99/mo (per project)
• Plans and tiers: Starter $99; Pro $299/mo PER PROJECT (brand + focus area).
• Demo requirement: No
• Entry allowance: Starter: monthly visibility audit + weekly snapshots; Pro daily snapshots and five monthly audit types
• AI platforms: Multiple LLMs; engine/response allocation depends on project scope
• How it measures: Direct API structured simulated conversations (no browser replay)
• Why it is listed: Funded company specialist. Named cofounders; Pioneer Square Labs formation and disclosed pre-seed funding.

Top 3 pros

• Buyer-persona and focus-area analysis
• Repeated simulated conversations
• Pro joins citation, sentiment, technical and content audits

Top 3 cons

• API conversations can differ from consumer search interfaces
• Separate focus areas/projects add subscriptions
• Starter lacks the full citation/sentiment audit bundle

Buying note. Research-panel visibility is a separate measure from real user demand or market share.

Pricing | Website | Company source | Back to the comparison table

HubSpot AEO

HubSpot AEO is best for small marketing teams and existing HubSpot customers. Plans start at $50 a month. You can buy without a demo.

• Best for: Small marketing teams and existing HubSpot customers
• Entry price: $50/mo
• Plans and tiers: Standalone $50/mo or $45/mo billed annually. Included with Marketing Hub Professional/Enterprise.
• Demo requirement: No
• Entry allowance: 25 prompts; 28-day trial
• AI platforms: ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity
• How it measures: Prompt monitoring, competitor comparison and recommendations
• Why it is listed: Established provider. HubSpot native commercial AEO product.

Top 3 pros

• Low entry from an established software company
• Standalone purchase does not require a CRM subscription
• Included for eligible Marketing Hub customers

Top 3 cons

• Only 25 prompts at entry
• Three engines omit Google AI Overviews/AI Mode
• Larger prompt panels require added capacity

Buying note. The free AEO Grader is a separate one-time assessment and a different product from this tracker.

Pricing | Website | Back to the comparison table

OmniSEO

OmniSEO is best for agencies and SMB teams that value an established marketing-company parent. Plans start at $89 a month. Lower tiers sell without a demo, and larger tiers go through sales.

• Best for: Agencies and SMB teams that value an established marketing-company parent
• Entry price: $89/mo
• Plans and tiers: Essentials $89; Pro $349; Enterprise $899+/mo. Essentials annual $890/year.
• Demo requirement: No for Essentials/Pro; enterprise sales-led
• Entry allowance: Essentials: 50 prompts, 5 competitors, 5 seats
• AI platforms: Essentials: AI Overviews, AI Mode, ChatGPT, Perplexity; Pro advertises 10 engines
• How it measures: Prompt tracking and competitor/source analysis
• Why it is listed: Established parent. WebFX / SEO.com product; established agency and commercial platform.

Top 3 pros

• WebFX/SEO.com company backing
• Five seats included at entry
• Self-service trial and higher-tier broad engine coverage

Top 3 cons

• Exports unavailable on Essentials
• Pro costs $349 for 100 prompts
• Ten-engine coverage requires a higher tier

Buying note. Managed marketing services are separate from this software comparison.

Pricing | Website | Back to the comparison table

OtterlyAI

OtterlyAI is best for small teams testing AI visibility; agencies needing a focused tracker. Plans start at $29 a month. You can buy without a demo.

• Best for: Small teams testing AI visibility; agencies needing a focused tracker
• Entry price: $29/mo
• Plans and tiers: Lite $29; Standard $189; Premium $489/mo. Annual equivalents $25/$160/$422. Extra engines cost extra.
• Demo requirement: No; enterprise sales-led
• Entry allowance: Lite: 15 prompts, 1 workspace; unlimited seats
• AI platforms: Included: ChatGPT, AI Overviews, Perplexity, Copilot. Gemini, AI Mode and Claude are paid add-ons
• How it measures: Daily prompt monitoring
• Why it is listed: Company specialist. OtterlyAI GmbH; identifiable legal company, team and supported commercial product.

Top 3 pros

• Low $29 entry price
• Unlimited team members
• Focused citations and competitor reporting

Top 3 cons

• Lite has only 15 prompts
• Gemini/AI Mode/Claude increase the bill
• API/MCP starts at Standard

Buying note. Otterly's free GEO tools are separate from the paid monitoring product priced here.

Pricing | Website | Company source | Back to the comparison table

Peec AI

Peec AI is best for in-house marketing teams and agencies prioritizing clear daily reporting. Plans start at $95 a month. You can buy without a demo.

• Best for: In-house marketing teams and agencies prioritizing clear daily reporting
• Entry price: $95/mo
• Plans and tiers: Starter $95; Pro $245; Advanced $495/mo; enterprise quote.
• Demo requirement: No for published plans; enterprise sales-led
• Entry allowance: Starter: 50 prompts, 3 chosen models, 1 project; unlimited users
• AI platforms: Choose 3 at entry; supported-model menu includes ChatGPT, Google AI Mode/Overviews, Gemini, Copilot and Naver; broader enterprise menu
• How it measures: Daily monitored prompts
• Why it is listed: Funded company specialist. Named founders and company team; disclosed institutional funding.

Top 3 pros

• Unlimited users
• Clear visibility, position and source analysis
• Agency/multiple-project and reporting upgrades

Top 3 cons

• Only 3 models included at entry
• One Starter project
• API/SSO requires enterprise scope

Buying note. Peec's current pricing is in US dollars. Older comparisons quote euros. Confirm the model selector for the engines you need.

Pricing | Website | Company source | Back to the comparison table

Profound

Profound is best for enterprise brands and agencies needing deep research, governance and activation. Brand pricing is custom, and the Agency plan is priced separately. Lower tiers sell without a demo, and larger tiers go through sales.

• Best for: Enterprise brands and agencies needing deep research, governance and activation
• Entry price: Custom
• Plans and tiers: Brands: custom paid pricing after 7-day trial. Agency Growth: $99/mo base PLUS $399/mo per ongoing client workspace.
• Demo requirement: Brand paid plans sales-led; Agency Growth self-service
• Entry allowance: Brand trial: 50 prompts on 3 engines. Agency paid client workspace: 100 unique prompts/day on 3 engines
• AI platforms: Trial: ChatGPT, Gemini, AI Overviews; enterprise up to 9 engines. Agency client workspace: ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews
• How it measures: Answer visibility, prompt-demand research and agent/crawler analytics
• Why it is listed: Established company specialist. Enterprise commercial platform, named leadership and documented major-brand customers.

Top 3 pros

• Deep research and citation analysis
• Enterprise governance and dedicated support
• Content agents and agency pitch workflow

Top 3 cons

• No public fixed paid brand price
• Agency base fee does not include an ongoing client workspace
• Engine/agent/API scope requires plan-specific confirmation

Buying note. Profound prices Brand and Agency plans separately on its current page. Older brand-plan figures in circulation are outdated.

Pricing | Website | Back to the comparison table

Promptwatch

Promptwatch is best for teams that want monitoring plus crawler analysis and content actions. Plans start at $95 a month. Lower tiers sell without a demo, and larger tiers go through sales.

• Best for: Teams that want monitoring plus crawler analysis and content actions
• Entry price: $95/mo
• Plans and tiers: Essential $95; Professional $245; Business $579/mo.
• Demo requirement: No for Essential/Professional; Business has demo CTA
• Entry allowance: Essential: 50 prompts, 6,000 responses/month, 1 project, 4 models
• AI platforms: Four models included at entry; larger supported-model menu and localized tracking on upgrades
• How it measures: Answer monitoring plus AI crawler/traffic analysis
• Why it is listed: Funded company specialist. Named cofounders, Amsterdam team and disclosed seed funding.

Top 3 pros

• Answer and crawler/traffic signals together
• API/MCP access on paid plans
• Professional adds content generation and more projects

Top 3 cons

• Four-model cap on Essential
• Entry seat/project limits
• City/state tracking and advanced governance cost more

Buying note. Essential includes no AEO article allowance, although some older articles say otherwise.

Pricing | Website | Company source | Back to the comparison table

Rankscale

Rankscale is best for agencies managing several brands with flexible credit allocation. Plans start at $99 a month. You can buy without a demo.

• Best for: Agencies managing several brands with flexible credit allocation
• Entry price: $99/mo
• Plans and tiers: Pro $99; Growth $385; Enterprise $780/mo.
• Demo requirement: No
• Entry allowance: Pro: 1,200 credits, up to 4,800 answers, 10 brand dashboards, 50 page audits
• AI platforms: Multiple engines; some cost 0.25 credits, others substantially more
• How it measures: Model/API and consumer-interface options; engine-specific credit weights
• Why it is listed: Company specialist. Current company team page names CEO/CMO/CTO plus engineers and support.

Top 3 pros

• Ten brand dashboards at entry
• Flexible credits and page audits
• Named cofounders, engineering and support team

Top 3 cons

• Up to 4,800 answers depends on engine choice
• API/white-label reporting requires Growth
• Mixed answer methods require careful configuration

Buying note. Older write-ups quote outdated pricing. Use the current pricing page.

Pricing | Website | Company source | Back to the comparison table

Scrunch

Scrunch is best for midmarket/enterprise teams combining answer tracking with site readiness. Plans start at $250 a month. You can buy without a demo.

• Best for: Midmarket/enterprise teams combining answer tracking with site readiness
• Entry price: $250/mo
• Plans and tiers: Core $250/mo; enterprise quote.
• Demo requirement: No for Core; enterprise sales-led
• Entry allowance: Core: 125 prompts, 5,000 responses, 1 workspace, 5 users, 5 site audits
• AI platforms: Core: ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews, Copilot; enterprise up to 9 engines
• How it measures: Monitoring, site audits, agent/referral analytics; AXP on enterprise scope
• Why it is listed: Funded company specialist. Company discloses institutional investors and named customers.

Top 3 pros

• Visibility and technical site readiness together
• Five seats and site audits in Core
• Funded company with named enterprise customers

Top 3 cons

• Core limited to four engines
• One country/language/persona at entry
• AXP/API/SSO and broader coverage require enterprise scope

Buying note. Older write-ups list $300 pricing and different prompt limits. Core is $250 on the current page.

Pricing | Website | Company source | Back to the comparison table

SE Visible (SE Ranking)

SE Visible (SE Ranking) is best for marketing teams and agencies wanting broad prompt coverage at a modest price. Plans start at $99 a month. Lower tiers sell without a demo, and larger tiers go through sales.

• Best for: Marketing teams and agencies wanting broad prompt coverage at a modest price
• Entry price: $99/mo
• Plans and tiers: Basic $99; Core $189; Plus $355/mo. SE Ranking AI Search add-on is a separate purchase path: $89/mo plus a base subscription.
• Demo requirement: No for Basic/Core; Plus has demo CTA
• Entry allowance: Basic: 200 prompts, 3 projects
• AI platforms: ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity
• How it measures: Browser-based answers; daily by default
• Why it is listed: Established parent. SE Ranking product with documented support and pricing.

Top 3 pros

• 200 entry prompts and 3 projects
• Five important AI surfaces included
• Established SE Ranking parent and location filters

Top 3 cons

• Claude/Copilot not in documented five-engine set
• Tracking history starts when the project is created
• Standalone prompts and suite add-on checks are different billing units

Buying note. Standalone SE Visible is the entry compared here. The SE Ranking AI Search add-on bundles SE Visible access, so confirm requirements before buying both.

Pricing | Website | Company source | Back to the comparison table

Searchable

Searchable is best for brands and agencies wanting monitoring, unlimited projects and content/audits. Plans start at $125 a month. Lower tiers sell without a demo, and larger tiers go through sales.

• Best for: Brands and agencies wanting monitoring, unlimited projects and content/audits
• Entry price: $125/mo
• Plans and tiers: Pro $125; Scale $400; Enterprise $999/mo; custom quote. Additional models cost extra.
• Demo requirement: No for Pro/Scale; Enterprise/Custom sales-led
• Entry allowance: Pro: 100 prompts/model, 9,000 answers/month, unlimited projects/seats, 12-month history
• AI platforms: Included: ChatGPT, AI Overviews, Perplexity; six additional model families offered as paid add-ons
• How it measures: Daily tracking, source/competitor analysis, audits and content workflows
• Why it is listed: Funded company specialist. Registered Searchable Limited; disclosed institutional funding and named customer case studies.

Top 3 pros

• Unlimited projects, seats and country/region filters
• Daily tracking plus content and site audits
• Disclosed funding and documented company/customer presence

Top 3 cons

• Only three models included in headline price
• API/white label/Looker require Scale or higher
• Extra engine coverage increases the subscription

Buying note. Plan cards and explanatory copy differ in details; use the current comparison table and confirm add-on model cost.

Pricing | Website | Company source | Back to the comparison table

Waikay (InLinks)

Waikay (InLinks) is best for small brand teams focused on factual accuracy and entity understanding. Plans start at $24.95 a month. You can buy without a demo.

• Best for: Small brand teams focused on factual accuracy and entity understanding
• Entry price: $24.95/mo
• Plans and tiers: Starter $24.95; Expert $69.95; Agency $199.95/mo; three non-renewing free credits.
• Demo requirement: No
• Entry allowance: Starter: 8 report credits; Expert 30; Agency 90
• AI platforms: Multiple AI engines; monitoring configuration determines credit use
• How it measures: Brand visibility plus factual/entity analysis; reports use credits
• Why it is listed: Established parent. InLinks Optimization Ltd; documented company registration and leadership.

Top 3 pros

• Established InLinks ownership and named leadership
• Strong brand-fact/entity emphasis
• Low-cost starting plan

Top 3 cons

• Eight report credits is a small entry allowance
• Reports/monitoring credits are harder to compare with daily prompts
• Confirm engine, cadence and answer-collection method for the chosen plan

Buying note. Eight credits is a report allowance. The number of prompts it covers depends on the monitoring setup.

Pricing | Website | Company source | Back to the comparison table

ZipTie

ZipTie is best for agencies needing flexible cadences and many projects without seat fees. Pricing is usage-based. You can buy without a demo.

• Best for: Agencies needing flexible cadences and many projects without seat fees
• Entry price: Usage-based
• Plans and tiers: About $0.01 per engine check; vendor example: 50 daily prompts × 3 engines = $42.75/mo. API/MCP +$10/mo.
• Demo requirement: No
• Entry allowance: Build a plan from prompts × cadence × engines; unlimited seats/projects/competitors
• AI platforms: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, AI Mode, Google AI Overviews, Bing AI Overview, Copilot
• How it measures: Scheduled engine checks with selectable cadence
• Why it is listed: Company specialist. Named SEO-expert cofounders and supported product.

Top 3 pros

• Flexible daily/weekly/monthly capacity
• No per-seat/project/competitor fees
• Seven surfaces including Google and Bing

Top 3 cons

• Total rises with engines and frequency
• UGC add-on multiplies monitoring subtotal by 1.8
• API is paid and unavailable during trial

Buying note. Use the vendor calculator for a real quote. The cent-per-check rate is approximate, and the minimum subscription was not independently confirmed.

Website | Company source | Back to the comparison table

SEO platforms with AI visibility tracking (19)

These platforms add AI visibility tracking to a rank-tracking or SEO product, which suits teams that already use the platform.

Adobe Brand Visibility (formerly LLM Optimizer)

Adobe Brand Visibility (formerly LLM Optimizer) is best for global enterprise brands with complex CMS and analytics requirements. Pricing is by quote, with no fixed public price. Purchase goes through sales.

• Best for: Global enterprise brands with complex CMS and analytics requirements
• Entry price: Quote
• Plans and tiers: No public fixed price verified.
• Demo requirement: Request-demo sales path
• Entry allowance: Contract-specific; up to 5 direct competitors described
• AI platforms: Ten LLM families, 25+ languages; state/city filters advertised
• How it measures: Visibility, crawls/clickstream, content optimization and analytics attribution
• Why it is listed: Established provider. Adobe enterprise commercial product.

Top 3 pros

• Adobe enterprise ecosystem and governance
• Broad model/language/location coverage
• Optimization and revenue analytics integration

Top 3 cons

• No public price
• Enterprise integration/setup burden
• Published direct-competitor allowance is limited

Buying note. Current product is Brand Visibility; older LLM Optimizer pages resolve to the renamed offering. Can support non-AEM sites.

Website | Back to the comparison table

Advanced Web Ranking AI Visibility

Advanced Web Ranking AI Visibility is best for SEO agencies prioritizing reporting and unlimited users/projects. Plans start at $139 a month. You can buy without a demo.

• Best for: SEO agencies prioritizing reporting and unlimited users/projects
• Entry price: $139/mo
• Plans and tiers: Pro $139; Agency $279; Enterprise $699; Enterprise Plus $980/mo.
• Demo requirement: No for main public plans; top tier demo CTA
• Entry allowance: Pro: 7,000 keyword units; AI usage consumes plan capacity
• AI platforms: AI visibility and citations alongside SERP tracking; exact engine costs vary
• How it measures: Shared ranking-unit quota with AI checks
• Why it is listed: Established provider. Advanced Web Ranking / Caphyon commercial platform.

Top 3 pros

• Established rank-tracking company
• Unlimited users and projects
• Mature SEO reporting with AI visibility

Top 3 cons

• Keyword units form a shared quota that AI checks draw on
• API/Looker requires Agency
• Broad SEO interface can be excessive for tracking alone

Buying note. Confirm AI engine multipliers before estimating daily prompt capacity.

Pricing | Website | Back to the comparison table

Ahrefs Brand Radar

Ahrefs Brand Radar is best for SEO teams researching broad brand citations plus custom tracked prompts. Plans start at €47 a month (custom prompts; index extra). You can buy without a demo.

• Best for: SEO teams researching broad brand citations plus custom tracked prompts
• Entry price: €47/mo (custom prompts; index extra)
• Plans and tiers: Custom prompts from €47/mo for 2,500 checks. Index from €179/mo; all AI indexes €654/mo. USD indexed prices differ; confirm checkout currency.
• Demo requirement: No
• Entry allowance: Custom allowance: 2,500 checks; index sold separately
• AI platforms: Broad AI indexes plus custom checks, including Claude in current product
• How it measures: Large keyword-derived answer index and separate custom prompt panels
• Why it is listed: Established provider. Ahrefs standalone commercial Brand Radar product.

Top 3 pros

• Established Ahrefs provider
• Broad discovery index plus custom tracking
• Source URL and SEO context together

Top 3 cons

• Index prompts are proxies built from search queries
• Index and custom monitoring have separate prices
• Custom checks and overages scale with sampling volume

Buying note. Standalone Brand Radar requires no base Ahrefs SEO subscription. Index coverage can miss niche topics. The browser used for this research showed euro pricing.

Website | Company source | Back to the comparison table

Botify AI Visibility

Botify AI Visibility is best for large ecommerce/enterprise sites combining SKU visibility and technical SEO. Pricing is by quote, with no fixed public price. Purchase goes through sales.

• Best for: Large ecommerce/enterprise sites combining SKU visibility and technical SEO
• Entry price: Quote
• Plans and tiers: No public fixed price verified.
• Demo requirement: Demo/sales route
• Entry allowance: Contract-specific
• AI platforms: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, AI Mode, Gemini listed
• How it measures: AI answer/product tracking plus logs, GSC and technical optimization
• Why it is listed: Established provider. Botify native commercial enterprise platform.

Top 3 pros

• Product/SKU visibility for ecommerce
• Technical/log and search evidence together
• Established enterprise optimization platform

Top 3 cons

• No public price
• Implementation suits large complex sites
• Only five AI surfaces explicitly listed on product page

Buying note. Ask which technical/activation modules are included with AI Visibility.

Website | Back to the comparison table

BrightEdge AI Catalyst

BrightEdge AI Catalyst is best for enterprise teams already using BrightEdge for SEO. Pricing is by quote, with no fixed public price. Purchase goes through sales.

• Best for: Enterprise teams already using BrightEdge for SEO
• Entry price: Quote
• Plans and tiers: Public standalone price not verified; request package-specific quote.
• Demo requirement: Demo/sales path; mandatory demo not stated
• Entry allowance: Contract-specific
• AI platforms: Documented Google AI and major assistants; exact plan engine set must be confirmed
• How it measures: Prompt/journey visibility, mentions, citations and site recommendations
• Why it is listed: Established provider. BrightEdge native product and official product documentation.

Top 3 pros

• Established BrightEdge enterprise platform
• Distinguishes mentions from citations
• Connects tracking to enterprise SEO actions

Top 3 cons

• No verified public standalone price
• Existing-customer inclusion varies by package
• Exact model limits and quotas require sales confirmation

Buying note. Early announcements of free access for customers may not apply to every current package.

Pricing | Website | Back to the comparison table

Conductor AI Search Performance

Conductor AI Search Performance is best for enterprise content/SEO teams needing governance and a unified workflow. Pricing is by quote, with no fixed public price. Purchase goes through sales.

• Best for: Enterprise content/SEO teams needing governance and a unified workflow
• Entry price: Quote
• Plans and tiers: No public fixed price verified.
• Demo requirement: Trial/demo offered; paid checkout not public
• Entry allowance: Contract-specific
• AI platforms: Multi-engine AI search tracking; persona/topic/intent analysis
• How it measures: Enterprise SEO, AI visibility and content workflow
• Why it is listed: Established provider. Conductor enterprise commercial platform.

Top 3 pros

• Established enterprise search provider
• Persona/intent and source analysis
• Content workflows and enterprise governance

Top 3 cons

• Price requires a quote
• Broader platform requires training/setup
• Engine, API and usage entitlements depend on contract

Buying note. Trials do not establish self-service purchase. Confirm pricing and implementation separately.

Website | Back to the comparison table

DemandSphere DemandMetrics GenAI

DemandSphere DemandMetrics GenAI is best for SEO agencies wanting daily AI monitoring with flexible keyword/prompt allocation. Plans start at $79 a month (billed annually). You can buy without a demo.

• Best for: SEO agencies wanting daily AI monitoring with flexible keyword/prompt allocation
• Entry price: $79/mo (billed annually)
• Plans and tiers: Starter $79/mo billed annually; Pro $208/mo annual. Monthly rates not confirmed in this snapshot.
• Demo requirement: Trial route shown; enterprise sales-led
• Entry allowance: Starter: 1,000 keyword units OR 100 LLM prompts; one prompt uses 10 keyword units
• AI platforms: Plan page: ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Copilot; larger product scope can differ
• How it measures: Daily prompt tracking plus traditional SERP and analytics integration
• Why it is listed: Established provider. DemandSphere / DemandMetrics commercial search analytics platform.

Top 3 pros

• Six documented engines on plan comparison
• SEO keyword and LLM prompt allocation
• Citations/mentions with analytics context

Top 3 cons

• Quoted entry requires annual commitment
• Prompts share capacity with SEO keywords
• Marketing mentions 10+ engines while the plan page lists six

Buying note. Confirm monthly billing and exact six-engine simultaneous usage in the quote/checkout.

Pricing | Website | Back to the comparison table

Keyword.com AI Visibility

Keyword.com AI Visibility is best for budget-conscious teams wanting API access and flexible credit monitoring. Plans start at $9.80 a month. You can buy without a demo.

• Best for: Budget-conscious teams wanting API access and flexible credit monitoring
• Entry price: $9.80/mo
• Plans and tiers: AI Visibility from $9.80/mo or $7.83/mo annual; credit quantity selected separately. White label +$29/mo.
• Demo requirement: No
• Entry allowance: Selectable credit package; unlimited users/projects
• AI platforms: ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Gemini, Mistral, DeepSeek, Copilot, Claude
• How it measures: Credit-based prompt checks, citation and sentiment reporting
• Why it is listed: Established provider. Keyword.com established commercial rank-tracking provider.

Top 3 pros

• Very low advertised starting price
• AI Visibility API and live report sharing
• Nine documented AI surfaces

Top 3 cons

• Headline rate buys a small selected credit package
• Engine/cadence choices change consumption
• White label costs extra; unused credits do not roll over

Buying note. The base credit quantity could not be confirmed from the plan selector. Use the credit calculator for a real prompt panel.

Pricing | Website | Back to the comparison table

Mangools AI Search Watcher

Mangools AI Search Watcher is best for SMBs already using Mangools who want an approachable tracker. A public paid price could not be verified. The paid purchase route could not be verified.

• Best for: SMBs already using Mangools who want an approachable tracker
• Entry price: Not verified
• Plans and tiers: A pricing page exists, but live public cards/paid rate could not be verified. Confirm inside the trial or with support.
• Demo requirement: No demo needed to start; paid purchase route not fully verified
• Entry allowance: Public paid prompt/check allowance not verified
• AI platforms: ChatGPT, AI Overviews, AI Mode, Gemini, Claude, Grok, Mistral, Llama listed
• How it measures: Keyword-to-prompt tracking, citations and competitors
• Why it is listed: Established parent. Mangools product owned by Itrinity.

Top 3 pros

• Established Mangools/Itrinity parent
• Eight listed AI engines
• Keyword-oriented setup for existing SEO users

Top 3 cons

• Public pricing and quotas could not be confirmed
• Perplexity not in the listed eight engines
• Keyword-derived prompts need review against real buyer intent

Buying note. A pricing page exists, but the paid rate could not be confirmed publicly. Check inside the trial or with support. This entry carries no claim that the product is free or demo-only.

Pricing | Website | Back to the comparison table

Morningscore

Morningscore is best for small businesses wanting guided SEO tasks with AI tracking. Plans start at $69 a month. You can buy without a demo.

• Best for: Small businesses wanting guided SEO tasks with AI tracking
• Entry price: $69/mo
• Plans and tiers: Lite $69; Business $99; Pro $159; Premium $299/mo.
• Demo requirement: No
• Entry allowance: Lite: 100 AI credits; Business 1,000; Pro 5,000; Premium 20,000
• AI platforms: ChatGPT prompt tracker and Google AI Overviews documented; confirm any newer surfaces
• How it measures: SEO task platform, GEO score and credit-based AI checks
• Why it is listed: Company specialist. Operating SEO software company with supported multi-plan commercial product.

Top 3 pros

• Practical guided SEO workflow
• AI tracking included across paid tiers
• Public pricing and trial

Top 3 cons

• Only 100 AI credits on Lite
• Credits shared with other AI features
• Narrower clearly documented engine scope than dedicated broad trackers

Buying note. Content generation and monitoring may draw from the same AI allowance.

Pricing | Website | Back to the comparison table

Nightwatch AI + SEO

Nightwatch AI + SEO is best for agencies wanting combined rank tracking and AI visibility. Plans start at €79 a month (term unconfirmed). You can buy without a demo.

• Best for: Agencies wanting combined rank tracking and AI visibility
• Entry price: €79/mo (term unconfirmed)
• Plans and tiers: Starter €79; Pro €159; Agency €399/mo displayed. Confirm billing term and currency at checkout.
• Demo requirement: No
• Entry allowance: Starter: 50 prompts, 1,500 AI answers, 500 SEO keywords, 5 sites
• AI platforms: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Mode, AI Overviews
• How it measures: AI response quota plus traditional/local rank tracking
• Why it is listed: Established provider. Nightwatch supported commercial search platform.

Top 3 pros

• Six important AI surfaces
• SEO/local ranking bundled
• Five sites on Starter

Top 3 cons

• Answer allowance cannot run every prompt on all six engines daily
• API/Looker/white label require Pro
• Displayed billing term must be confirmed

Buying note. 1,500 AI answers is a sampling budget. Running 50 prompts on 6 engines every day for 30 days takes 9,000 checks.

Pricing | Website | Back to the comparison table

Quattr AI Visibility

Quattr AI Visibility is best for enterprise teams wanting evidence-linked SEO and content execution. Pricing is by quote, with no fixed public price. Purchase goes through sales.

• Best for: Enterprise teams wanting evidence-linked SEO and content execution
• Entry price: Quote
• Plans and tiers: No public fixed price verified.
• Demo requirement: Request-demo route; no public paid checkout found
• Entry allowance: Contract-specific
• AI platforms: AI visibility plus SEO/GSC/ranking inputs; exact platform set not public
• How it measures: AI and SEO analysis connected to content/optimization agents
• Why it is listed: Company specialist. Commercial enterprise search software company and supported platform.

Top 3 pros

• SEO and AI visibility in the same workflow
• Evidence-linked recommendations
• Optimization and content execution

Top 3 cons

• No public price
• Data integration/setup work
• Engine/usage limits not itemized publicly

Buying note. Examples on the vendor's website are illustrative and say nothing about customer results or product accuracy.

Website | Back to the comparison table

Search Atlas LLM Visibility

Search Atlas LLM Visibility is best for agencies wanting SEO automation, content and AI visibility together. Plans start at $199 a month. You can buy without a demo.

• Best for: Agencies wanting SEO automation, content and AI visibility together
• Entry price: $199/mo
• Plans and tiers: AI visibility starts on Growth $199/mo; Pro $399; Agency Enterprise $999+. $99 Starter does not include current AI visibility.
• Demo requirement: No for Growth/Pro; enterprise sales-led
• Entry allowance: Growth: 120,000 universal credits, 2 projects, 3 seats
• AI platforms: Growth: ChatGPT, Gemini, AI Mode; broader coverage on Pro
• How it measures: Suite-wide universal credits; AI monitoring and optimization
• Why it is listed: Established provider. Search Atlas / LinkGraph commercial platform.

Top 3 pros

• SEO/content/AI automation in one suite
• Agency reporting and white-label upgrade path
• Multiple projects/seats at AI entry

Top 3 cons

• AI visibility starts at the $199 Growth plan, since the $99 Starter excludes it
• Universal credits are shared across many tools
• Entry AI coverage is only three surfaces

Buying note. The 120,000 universal credits are shared across features and do not equal 120,000 monitored AI answers.

Pricing | Website | Back to the comparison table

Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit

Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit is best for existing Semrush users wanting prompt research, tracking and AI site readiness. Plans start at $99 a month (per domain). You can buy without a demo.

• Best for: Existing Semrush users wanting prompt research, tracking and AI site readiness
• Entry price: $99/mo (per domain)
• Plans and tiers: $99/mo per domain; 50 extra tracked prompts +$60/mo. Additional user licenses can add cost. Enterprise AIO is separately quoted.
• Demo requirement: No for Toolkit; enterprise sales-led
• Entry allowance: 25 custom tracked prompts, 300 daily report allowance, 1 domain
• AI platforms: AI answer visibility database and prompt-tracking surfaces; verify exact platform entitlements
• How it measures: Broad AI research index plus custom prompt tracking and site audit
• Why it is listed: Established provider. Semrush commercial AI toolkit and enterprise offering.

Top 3 pros

• Established SEO platform
• Research index and tracked prompts together
• AI readiness integrated with site audit

Top 3 cons

• Only 25 tracked prompts at entry
• Per-domain and user/additional-prompt charges
• No standalone Toolkit free trial documented

Buying note. 300 reports is a different unit than 300 unique tracked prompts. Semrush One bundles and enterprise products have separate scope.

Pricing | Website | Company source | Back to the comparison table

seoClarity ArcAI

seoClarity ArcAI is best for large SEO teams monitoring hundreds of prompts and brand accuracy. Pricing is by quote, with no fixed public price. Purchase goes through sales.

• Best for: Large SEO teams monitoring hundreds of prompts and brand accuracy
• Entry price: Quote
• Plans and tiers: Core starts at 500 prompts; price by quote. Discovery/Accuracy modules can be additional.
• Demo requirement: Quote/demo offered; mandatory demo not stated
• Entry allowance: Core: minimum 500 prompts; contract-specific engine/check allocation
• AI platforms: Nine engine families advertised
• How it measures: AI visibility, accuracy/source intelligence and enterprise SEO integration
• Why it is listed: Established provider. seoClarity native enterprise product.

Top 3 pros

• Large starting prompt panel
• Accuracy and bot/source intelligence options
• Established enterprise SEO platform

Top 3 cons

• No public fixed price
• Discovery/Accuracy add-ons complicate comparisons
• 500-prompt minimum is excessive for small tests

Buying note. Ask for a written Core/Discovery/Accuracy breakdown before comparing quotes.

Pricing | Website | Back to the comparison table

SEOmonitor

SEOmonitor is best for agencies managing SEO campaigns in supported European markets. Plans start at €99 a month. You can buy without a demo.

• Best for: Agencies managing SEO campaigns in supported European markets
• Entry price: €99/mo
• Plans and tiers: Starter €99; Pro €299/mo. Entry includes AI index/AIO tools; richer brand-mention tracking is tier-dependent.
• Demo requirement: No
• Entry allowance: Starter: 1,000 SEO keywords, 1 campaign; Pro 3,000 and unlimited campaigns
• AI platforms: AI Visibility Index: ChatGPT + Google AI Overviews; weekly assistant tracking has separate plan scope
• How it measures: Google-volume-weighted index plus campaign and assistant tracking
• Why it is listed: Established provider. SEOmonitor commercial agency-focused platform.

Top 3 pros

• SEO campaign/forecasting context
• Citation/mention drilldowns
• Public plans and trial

Top 3 cons

• Current AI index limited to UK and Romania
• Google volume is a proxy for AI demand
• Weekly tracking and tier gates need matching to requirements

Buying note. The €99 tier includes AI index and AI Overviews tools. Brand-mention tracking across all assistants depends on tier, so confirm Pro requirements for your engines and markets.

Pricing | Website | Company source | Back to the comparison table

Similarweb AEO Intelligence

Similarweb AEO Intelligence is best for competitive-intelligence teams wanting AI brand visibility and traffic context. Plans start at $129 a month. You can buy without a demo.

• Best for: Competitive-intelligence teams wanting AI brand visibility and traffic context
• Entry price: $129/mo
• Plans and tiers: AEO Intelligence $129/mo or $99/mo annual. AEO + SEO Competitive Intelligence $399/mo ($333 annual).
• Demo requirement: No for published packages
• Entry allowance: 150 tracked prompts, 1 user, 3 months of history
• AI platforms: AI brand monitoring plus AI-search traffic/competitive data; purchased surface scope must be checked
• How it measures: Prompt visibility and competitive/panel traffic intelligence
• Why it is listed: Established provider. Similarweb native AI Search commercial packages.

Top 3 pros

• Established analytics company
• 150 entry prompts
• AI traffic and competitive context alongside visibility

Top 3 cons

• Only one included user
• Three months of history at entry
• Broader SEO/advertising bundles increase cost

Buying note. Similarweb's published AEO plans offer self-service trials.

Pricing | Website | Back to the comparison table

SISTRIX AI Check & Prompt Tracking

SISTRIX AI Check & Prompt Tracking is best for european SEO teams already subscribing to SISTRIX. Plans start at €119 a month. You can buy without a demo.

• Best for: European SEO teams already subscribing to SISTRIX
• Entry price: €119/mo
• Plans and tiers: SISTRIX Start €119; Plus €239; Professional €419; Premium €799/mo. AI tools currently included at no extra charge during development.
• Demo requirement: No
• Entry allowance: Plan-specific AI limits; AI tools currently developing/beta
• AI platforms: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and AI Mode documented
• How it measures: AI visibility database and custom prompt tracking
• Why it is listed: Established provider. SISTRIX native AI products with published commercial pricing.

Top 3 pros

• Established European SEO provider
• No current extra AI fee for subscribers
• AI and search visibility in one environment

Top 3 cons

• €119 base subscription needed for continuing paid access
• AI tools are still in development
• Vendor reserves right to price AI separately later

Buying note. AI tools are included at no extra charge during development, and that inclusion may change. Taxes extra.

Pricing | Website | Back to the comparison table

Ubersuggest AI Search Visibility

Ubersuggest AI Search Visibility is best for budget-conscious SMBs already using Neil Patel/Ubersuggest. Plans start at $29 a month. You can buy without a demo.

• Best for: Budget-conscious SMBs already using Neil Patel/Ubersuggest
• Entry price: $29/mo
• Plans and tiers: Individual $29; Business $49; Enterprise $99/mo.
• Demo requirement: No
• Entry allowance: Individual: 1 project, 10 prompts, monthly refresh, 250 credits
• AI platforms: ChatGPT, Gemini
• How it measures: Scheduled prompt visibility within Ubersuggest
• Why it is listed: Established provider. Neil Patel / NP Digital commercial software product.

Top 3 pros

• Low $29 bundled SEO entry
• Established Neil Patel/Ubersuggest product
• Simple combined SEO/AI workflow

Top 3 cons

• Only two documented engines
• Entry tracking updates monthly
• Small prompt limits; more frequent refresh requires higher plans

Buying note. Business refreshes biweekly and Enterprise weekly, with no daily tracking.

Pricing | Website | Back to the comparison table

Content optimization tools with AI tracking (5)

These tools pair content optimization with AI answer tracking.

Adaptify

Adaptify is best for agencies and in-house marketing teams wanting AI visibility tracking tied to SEO content production. Plans start at $499 a month. You can buy without a demo.

• Best for: Agencies and in-house marketing teams wanting AI visibility tracking tied to SEO content production
• Entry price: $499/mo
• Plans and tiers: Single Site $499/mo; Multi-Site $333/mo per site with a 3-site minimum ($999/mo). Both plans include a 7-day free trial.
• Demo requirement: No; 7-day free trial on both plans
• Entry allowance: No prompt allowance published; visibility data refreshes every 14 days
• AI platforms: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Copilot
• How it measures: Tracks brand mention, position and sentiment per prompt, writes content for missed prompts and re-tests on the next cycle
• Why it is listed: Funded company specialist. Miami company with named CTO Dominic Zijlstra, CPO Hansjan Kamerling and CMO Luke Heinecke; TinySeed invested in 2023.

Top 3 pros

• Missed prompts turn into published content, then get re-tested
• Five engines including Claude
• White-label client reporting on the Multi-Site plan

Top 3 cons

• 14-day refresh is slower than daily trackers
• No prompt allowance is published
• White label requires the $999 Multi-Site minimum

Buying note. The $499 plan covers content, backlinks, keyword research and technical SEO, with AI tracking as one part, so it does not compare directly with tracker-only prices. The 1,000+ agency count is a vendor claim. adaptify.ai is the SEO platform listed here, and adaptify.com is an unrelated insurance software company. Price read from the vendor's pricing page on October 12, 2026.

Pricing | Website | Company source | Back to the comparison table

AirOps

AirOps is best for content operations teams wanting monitoring to trigger production workflows. Pricing is by quote, with no fixed public price. Purchase goes through sales.

• Best for: Content operations teams wanting monitoring to trigger production workflows
• Entry price: Quote
• Plans and tiers: Paid search/content scope quoted; 14-day trial advertises 50,000 builder credits.
• Demo requirement: Trial available; paid scope sales-led
• Entry allowance: Task and credit-based contract. Trial credits are workflow credits and carry no monitored AI answers.
• AI platforms: Search/AI visibility insights feed workflow engine; exact engine/monitoring quota needs confirmation
• How it measures: AI search insights, content workflows and CMS integrations
• Why it is listed: Funded company specialist. Operating commercial workflow company with enterprise customers.

Top 3 pros

• Monitoring connected to content production
• Workflow/CMS integration
• Team-scale repeatable content operations

Top 3 cons

• No verified simple public tracker price
• Task/credit budgets are hard to compare with prompt plans
• Workflow setup is more involved than a standalone dashboard

Buying note. The 50,000 builder credits are workflow credits and do not equal 50,000 tracked prompts or AI answers.

Pricing | Website | Back to the comparison table

Clearscope

Clearscope is best for editorial/content teams wanting AI monitoring tied to content improvement. Plans start at $129 a month. You can buy without a demo.

• Best for: Editorial/content teams wanting AI monitoring tied to content improvement
• Entry price: $129/mo
• Plans and tiers: Essentials $129; Business $399/mo; enterprise quote.
• Demo requirement: No for public plans; enterprise sales-led
• Entry allowance: Essentials: 50 tracked queries, 50 tracked pages; unlimited users/projects
• AI platforms: ChatGPT, Gemini documented
• How it measures: Query and cited-page tracking plus content research/optimization
• Why it is listed: Established provider. Clearscope / Mushi Labs established content software provider.

Top 3 pros

• Content optimization and tracking together
• Unlimited users and projects
• Public plans, support and no minimum contract

Top 3 cons

• Only two clearly documented AI engines
• Query/page allowances limit entry scope
• Broader content tooling costs more than simple monitoring

Buying note. Keep tracked query and tracked page allowances distinct.

Pricing | Website | Back to the comparison table

Surfer AI Search Analytics

Surfer AI Search Analytics is best for content/SEO teams wanting cited-gap analysis alongside optimization. Plans start at $82 a month (billed annually). You can buy without a demo.

• Best for: Content/SEO teams wanting cited-gap analysis alongside optimization
• Entry price: $82/mo (billed annually)
• Plans and tiers: Standalone AI Search Analytics $82/mo annual. Full Surfer Standard $99 annual (25 prompts weekly, ChatGPT only); Pro $182 annual (50 daily, 5 surfaces).
• Demo requirement: No for public plans; enterprise sales-led
• Entry allowance: Standalone: 50 daily prompts, 5 brand spaces
• AI platforms: Standalone/Pro: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, AI Mode, Gemini
• How it measures: Prompt monitoring, sentiment and mention/content gap analysis
• Why it is listed: Established provider. Surfer established commercial content optimization company.

Top 3 pros

• Standalone tracker available
• Connects cited/mention gaps to content workflows
• Five important surfaces on standalone/Pro

Top 3 cons

• Displayed rates require annual billing
• Full-suite Standard is weekly and ChatGPT-only
• Full-suite API/advanced capacity requires higher tiers

Buying note. The Discovery plan has no AI tracking, so the standalone AI Search Analytics price is the AI monitoring entry point. The monthly standalone rate was not verified.

Pricing | Website | Back to the comparison table

Writesonic GEO

Writesonic GEO is best for content-heavy teams wanting generation, audits and visibility in one tool. Plans start at $99 a month. You can buy without a demo.

• Best for: Content-heavy teams wanting generation, audits and visibility in one tool
• Entry price: $99/mo
• Plans and tiers: Starter $99; Basic $249; Growth $499/mo. Annual $79/$199/$399 equivalents; enterprise quote.
• Demo requirement: No for public plans; enterprise sales-led
• Entry allowance: Starter: 50 prompts, 50 AI answers/day, 1 user, 1 project
• AI platforms: Starter/base: ChatGPT, Gemini, AI Overviews; broader 8-model scope enterprise
• How it measures: Answer quota plus content, audit and action workflows
• Why it is listed: Established company specialist. Writesonic commercial company with established content platform.

Top 3 pros

• Content and GEO work in one platform
• Three useful surfaces at entry
• Upgrade path to action/workflow automation

Top 3 cons

• 50 daily answers cannot check 50 prompts across all three engines daily
• Sentiment requires Growth
• Perplexity and broader coverage need a higher plan

Buying note. Daily answers and unique prompt limits are separate. Check plan gates rather than assuming all marketed engines are included.

Pricing | Website | Back to the comparison table

PR and brand platforms (4)

These platforms connect AI answers to brand reputation, PR and earned media.

BrandRank.AI

BrandRank.AI is best for enterprise brand, communications and risk teams prioritizing recommendation accuracy. Pricing is by quote, with no fixed public price. Purchase goes through sales.

• Best for: Enterprise brand, communications and risk teams prioritizing recommendation accuracy
• Entry price: Quote
• Plans and tiers: No public fixed price verified.
• Demo requirement: Consultation/demo path; mandatory demo not stated
• Entry allowance: Contract-specific
• AI platforms: ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Grok, Claude, Meta AI, DeepSeek
• How it measures: Daily priority-prompt panel, recommendation share, claim verification and risk analysis
• Why it is listed: Company specialist. Named CEO Pete Blackshaw and COO Hank Hudepohl; documented engineering base and major-brand customers.

Top 3 pros

• Measures recommendations and brand accuracy beyond mentions
• Seven documented AI engines
• Named experienced cofounders and major-brand customer evidence

Top 3 cons

• No public price
• Prompt/market/competitor entitlements require a quote
• Strategist-led enterprise scope is excessive for simple low-cost tracking

Buying note. Recommendation Share is the vendor's own metric and has no independent verification as market share.

Website | Company source | Back to the comparison table

Meltwater GenAI Lens

Meltwater GenAI Lens is best for PR and communications teams connecting AI narratives to earned media. Pricing is by quote, with no fixed public price. Purchase goes through sales.

• Best for: PR and communications teams connecting AI narratives to earned media
• Entry price: Quote
• Plans and tiers: Request pricing; no public fixed price verified.
• Demo requirement: Contact/demo or existing account representative
• Entry allowance: Contract-specific
• AI platforms: ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity and other engines; Google AI Overviews also marketed
• How it measures: Prompt-level visibility, prominence, sentiment and source attribution with media/social context
• Why it is listed: Established provider. Meltwater native commercial GenAI Lens product.

Top 3 pros

• Established media-intelligence company
• AI source attribution alongside PR/news/social data
• AI analytics API documented for entitled accounts

Top 3 cons

• No public fixed price
• Module/API entitlements require sales confirmation
• Media intelligence scope can be excessive for basic prompt monitoring

Buying note. Confirm exact engine/UI versus API variants and citation export fields in the contract.

Website | Company source | Back to the comparison table

Onclusive GEO Analytics

Onclusive GEO Analytics is best for PR teams wanting AI source targets and earned-media context. Plans start at $105 a month (billed annually). Purchase goes through sales.

• Best for: PR teams wanting AI source targets and earned-media context
• Entry price: $105/mo (billed annually)
• Plans and tiers: Starter from $105/mo annual; Essential $280; Professional $1,255; Enterprise custom.
• Demo requirement: Get Started links route to demo/sales
• Entry allowance: Starter: 80 prompts, 1 country, ChatGPT only
• AI platforms: Starter ChatGPT; Essential adds Perplexity/Gemini; Professional adds Claude/Grok
• How it measures: AI brand, sentiment, source targeting and media/social analytics
• Why it is listed: Established provider. Onclusive native GEO Analytics product.

Top 3 pros

• Established Onclusive provider
• Public starting prices
• Source targets and earned-media strategy connected

Top 3 cons

• Annual commitment at quoted prices
• Starter monitors only ChatGPT in one country
• Five-engine/three-country plan rises to $1,255/mo

Buying note. Prices are public, but every plan button routes to the sales or demo path.

Website | Back to the comparison table

Sprinklr LLM Insights

Sprinklr LLM Insights is best for enterprise consumer-intelligence and social teams with customer-conversation data. Pricing is by quote, with no fixed public price. Purchase goes through sales.

• Best for: Enterprise consumer-intelligence and social teams with customer-conversation data
• Entry price: Quote
• Plans and tiers: No public fixed LLM Insights price verified.
• Demo requirement: Schedule-demo route
• Entry allowance: Contract-specific; refresh can be daily, weekly or monthly
• AI platforms: ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and additional engines including Copilot; verify contract
• How it measures: Prompts informed by customer conversations; brand preference, citations and regional analysis
• Why it is listed: Established provider. Sprinklr native enterprise product with official release and support documentation.

Top 3 pros

• Established enterprise customer-experience provider
• Customer conversation signals inform prompt selection
• Source, sentiment and preference analysis in a unified workflow

Top 3 cons

• No public module price
• Broader enterprise platform/setup commitment
• Regional/engine usage entitlements need confirmation

Buying note. Prompts informed by customer conversations reflect a sample of consumer questions.

Website | Back to the comparison table

Local and multilocation platforms (4)

These platforms tie AI visibility to listings, reviews and location data for brands with many locations.

Birdeye Search AI

Birdeye Search AI is best for multilocation businesses tying AI visibility to reviews and listings. Pricing is by quote, with no fixed public price. Purchase goes through sales.

• Best for: Multilocation businesses tying AI visibility to reviews and listings
• Entry price: Quote
• Plans and tiers: Location and prompt-bundle pricing by quote.
• Demo requirement: Demo/sales route
• Entry allowance: One query × one engine × one location consumes prompt capacity; default monthly scans
• AI platforms: Seven AI engines documented; exact purchased coverage depends on contract
• How it measures: Local answer tracking with review/listing/content actions
• Why it is listed: Established provider. Birdeye native commercial AI search product.

Top 3 pros

• Location-level diagnosis
• Reviews/listings and corrective actions together
• Seven-engine monitoring scope

Top 3 cons

• Engine × location × query multiplies capacity
• Default scans are monthly
• Bundle downgrades can wait until contract renewal

Buying note. Prompt bundles do not roll over by default; documented overages can cost 1.25×.

Website | Company source | Back to the comparison table

Reputation AI Location Presence Insights

Reputation AI Location Presence Insights is best for multilocation brands needing local AI listing accuracy, mentions and sentiment. Pricing is by quote, with no fixed public price. Purchase goes through sales.

• Best for: Multilocation brands needing local AI listing accuracy, mentions and sentiment
• Entry price: Quote
• Plans and tiers: No public module price verified.
• Demo requirement: Contact/demo route; mandatory demo not stated
• Entry allowance: Location/contract-specific; public cadence/quota not confirmed
• AI platforms: ChatGPT and Gemini documented in official user guide
• How it measures: Location-specific AI listing accuracy, search mentions, sentiment and visibility dashboards
• Why it is listed: Established provider. Reputation Inc. official user guide documents AI Location Presence dashboards.

Top 3 pros

• Established Reputation software company
• Checks address/contact/hour accuracy in AI answers
• Location-level mentions, visibility and sentiment together

Top 3 cons

• No public module price
• Only two engines clearly verified in this snapshot
• Tracking cadence and prompt allowances require confirmation

Buying note. Feature confirmed from indexed excerpts of Reputation's guide. Confirm the current release and cadence during purchase.

Pricing | Website | Company source | Back to the comparison table

Uberall GEO Studio

Uberall GEO Studio is best for multilocation brands wanting to act on AI visibility inside their local-marketing platform. Pricing is by quote, with no fixed public price. Purchase goes through sales.

• Best for: Multilocation brands wanting to act on AI visibility inside their local-marketing platform
• Entry price: Quote
• Plans and tiers: No public fixed GEO Studio price verified.
• Demo requirement: Demo/plans route; no public paid checkout verified
• Entry allowance: Location/contract-specific
• AI platforms: ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews documented
• How it measures: Local visibility, sources, brand facts and integrated publishing actions
• Why it is listed: Established provider. Uberall native GEO Studio commercial product.

Top 3 pros

• Local source/fact diagnosis
• Can act through listings, local pages and content
• Established location-marketing parent

Top 3 cons

• No public standalone price
• Broader location platform can be excessive for one brand
• Engine quotas and location capacity require confirmation

Buying note. Best fit assumes a meaningful local/multilocation footprint.

Website | Back to the comparison table

Yext Scout

Yext Scout is best for retail/franchise/local brands managing many locations. Pricing is by quote, with no fixed public price. Purchase goes through sales.

• Best for: Retail/franchise/local brands managing many locations
• Entry price: Quote
• Plans and tiers: No public fixed price verified.
• Demo requirement: Get-demo route; no self-service paid checkout found
• Entry allowance: Location/contract-specific
• AI platforms: AI and traditional local search surfaces; exact engine package requires quote
• How it measures: Local search visibility, citations, sentiment and recommended actions
• Why it is listed: Established provider. Yext native Scout commercial product.

Top 3 pros

• Established Yext company
• Local listings and AI visibility in one workflow
• Designed for many locations

Top 3 cons

• No public price
• Sales procurement required
• Location count and broader platform scope can increase cost

Buying note. The public buying route is a demo request. A universal mandatory-demo rule is not publicly documented.

Website | Back to the comparison table

Managed enterprise platform (1)

This option combines a platform with an embedded marketing team.

Petra Labs

Petra Labs is best for enterprise teams wanting a platform plus embedded marketing execution. Pricing is by quote, with no fixed public price. Purchase goes through sales.

• Best for: Enterprise teams wanting a platform plus embedded marketing execution
• Entry price: Quote
• Plans and tiers: Custom platform/services partnership; public fixed price not verified.
• Demo requirement: Talk-to-expert consultation route
• Entry allowance: Contract-specific
• AI platforms: Cross-platform AI/product discovery research; exact quotas not public
• How it measures: Panel/persona insights, AI visibility, execution and attribution
• Why it is listed: Company specialist. Named founder/CEO, founding engineers and documented customer case studies.

Top 3 pros

• Hands-on execution alongside software
• Persona/product demand research
• Attribution and wider marketing analysis

Top 3 cons

• No transparent fixed entry price
• Services scope makes comparisons with pure SaaS difficult
• Engine, panel and tracking entitlements require a statement of work

Buying note. Petra positions itself as a hybrid platform and execution team for enterprise buyers.

Website | Back to the comparison table

How Do You Read the Comparison Table?

• Tool and best fit. The vendor's best-fit buyer in plain words. The tags show the audiences that label names, with the main audience first. Select the tool name to open its full details in the Big List.
• Entry price. The lowest public monthly price, before tax, in the currency the vendor displays. Quote means no fixed public price was found. The small line under the price shows what the entry plan includes, or the billing term.
• Buy without a demo?. Yes means public signup, trial or checkout. Lower tiers means ordinary tiers are self-service and larger tiers are sales-led. No, sales-led means the public route runs through a company representative. A demo button does not always mean a demo is mandatory. Unverified means the paid route could not be confirmed.
• Top 3 pros and cons. Editorial reads of each vendor's public features, pricing and plan limits.

How Do You Compare AI Visibility Tools Fairly?

• 1. Convert plans to one unit. Tools sell unique tracked prompts, generated prompts, answer checks, credits, reports and workflow tasks. A panel of 50 prompts across 5 engines checked daily for 30 days needs 7,500 engine checks.
• 2. Confirm the measurement method. Browser observations, direct model API calls and keyword-derived answer indexes can disagree. Ask for the exact engine and model, grounded or search mode, location, language, refresh cadence and repeated-sampling budget.
• 3. Separate the signals. Brand mention, recommendation, clickable citation or URL, site crawl, AI referral traffic and conversion are separate signals. A sampled visibility share is a sample, and total consumer market share is a different number.
• 4. Run a comparable trial. Use the same unbranded and branded prompt panels, market, language, competitors, engines and daily answer budget in every trial. Review raw answers and citation URLs, test exports, and price the full intended panel.

How Was This List Built and Kept Current?

• Company screen. Every tool comes from a named, accountable commercial company: an established software provider, an established parent company, or a specialist with verifiable team, funding or customer evidence. Related variants from one provider are one entry.
• Left out. One-time free graders, raw LLM and SERP APIs, local SEO products that do not monitor AI answers over time, and products no longer sold independently.
• Scope. A broad market inventory. It carries no guarantee that every vendor worldwide is included.
• Pros and cons. Editorial reads of public features, pricing and plan limits. No hands-on accuracy benchmark or customer-support test was run.
• Verification. Vendor pricing, product, support and company pages were read. No sales calls, login purchases or contract negotiations took place, and ambiguous prices are flagged instead of estimated.
• Refresh. Plans change often. Confirm the engines, sampling method, allowance, reporting access and contract on the vendor's pricing page before you buy.
• October 12, 2026. Added Adaptify and ChatRank, bringing the list to 54 tools. Prices for both were read on October 12, 2026.
• October 11, 2026. First version of the list: 52 tools, prices checked October 10, 2026.

Related Questions

A tool says 50 prompts. How many answers does it check each month?

That depends on engines and cadence. A panel of 50 prompts across 5 engines checked daily for 30 days needs 7,500 engine checks (50 × 5 × 30). Tools sell prompts, answer checks, credits or reports, and these units differ. Nightwatch Starter lists 50 prompts and 1,500 AI answers, which cannot run every prompt on all six engines daily. Convert every plan to engine checks per month before comparing prices.

Why does one tool show my brand in ChatGPT answers while another tool does not?

Tools collect answers in different ways. Browser observations, direct model API calls and keyword-derived answer indexes can disagree. Gumshoe uses direct API simulated conversations, and Ahrefs Brand Radar pairs a large keyword-derived index with separate custom prompt panels. Engine and model version, search-grounded mode, location, language and sampling count also change the result.

A tool says my brand was mentioned. Does that mean ChatGPT cited my site?

No. Brand mention, recommendation, clickable citation or URL, site crawl, AI referral traffic and conversion are separate signals. BrightEdge AI Catalyst, for example, separates mentions from citations. A missing citation also fails to prove that content was never retrieved.

Does a Request a Demo button mean I have to book a demo to buy?

Not always. Of the 54 tools, 28 sell through public self-service signup and 6 sell lower tiers that way. Brandlight, BrightEdge AI Catalyst, seoClarity ArcAI, BrandRank.AI and Reputation each offer a demo or quote path without stating that a demo is mandatory. Look for a checkout or signup button on the pricing page.

The listed price is $29 or $399 a month. What does that price leave out?

Check the billing term, the unit and the engine list. 4 priced tools show a rate that requires annual billing: Goodie, DemandSphere DemandMetrics GenAI, Surfer AI Search Analytics, Onclusive GEO Analytics. Semrush charges per domain, and Gumshoe Pro charges per project. OtterlyAI Lite covers four engines, and Gemini, AI Mode and Claude cost extra. Searchable Pro includes three models and sells six more as paid add-ons.

More resources like this go out as I write them.